Back to Blog

Fairly Comparing the Cost of Cloud Applications to Traditional Software

 

increased quality - speed - efficiencyAs a nonprofit, comparing a subscription-based (SaaS) cloud application for finance or donor management to similar traditional installed client/server application can be confusing.  It is easy, but misleading, to focus on licensing alone as the basis of comparison.  In fact, this is not an apples-to-apples comparison since many of the costs associated with applications installed and deployed on your local network infrastructure are hidden and not typically acknowledged as part of the total cost of the solution. 

In fact, I have heard more than one prospective client express confusion and concern about the ongoing costs of a SaaS subscription, but in the same breath dismiss the costs of servers, upgrades, remote access and other infrastructure as unavoidable.  This is easy to do if your organizational structure has those IT costs buried in an administrative budget and allocated to departments in an opaque fashion.

This kind of comparison wasn’t necessary in the past when all of the solutions being considered employed similar technology platforms and were going to be deployed in roughly the same fashion.  Back then, the only considerations were subtle differences in system requirements and pricing.  The reality is that the infrastructure and maintenance cost of traditional applications is relevant and should be factored fairly into your total cost of ownership calculation when including cloud-based applications. 

Things to keep in mind as you work through your evaluation:

  • Infrastructure isn’t free, even if it’s already there – Servers require maintenance, patches, upgrades, software and replacement.  Factoring a fairly allocated cost for the infrastructure required to deploy an on premises application is appropriate. 
  • Secure Remote Access – If remote access is required either for distributed offices or for flexible work arrangements, most traditional applications require things like web servers, VPN, Citrix and potentially other advanced networking tools, not to mention competent IT support, to be able to do so securely.  It’s assumed that in a true cloud-based SaaS environment that these costs are built into the subscription and you will enjoy secure access from anywhere at any time with no incremental cost.
  • Fit matters – No two applications address your organization’s critical business requirements exactly the same way.  No organization should choose or disqualify a cloud application just because it is a cloud application.  Capability and compatibility with your organization’s unique requirements and goals should be an overriding concern and factor into your comparison of any two systems, regardless of technology or business model.
  • The Future Matters – Sometimes the most feature-rich, capable application is also the one built on the most archaic technology platform.  If a capable system has passed its prime, technology-wise, you should expect to be subjected to a major, disruptive upgrade at some point in the future or slowly watch that application lose relevance as the march of technology pushes forward.  The viability of the technology in question both today and where the world it is likely to be in 7 years is an important consideration.

JMT has worked with a number of organizations in the very recent past where their unique circumstances made going with the cloud-based application a complete no-brainer, even though the nominal subscription costs seemed higher than traditional, locally installed alternatives over time.  In that same timeframe, we have matched organizations with those same traditional, locally installed applications because that it what made sense for that particular organization given their unique circumstances.  The important point in post is that you should not dismiss either option out of hand, but employ a fair, systematic approach to evaluating your options so that you can make an informed, deliberate decision.

Related Posts:
A Nonprofit’s Guide to Government Compliance
May 14, 2018
A Nonprofit’s Guide to Government Compliance

Compliance is a hefty responsibility for nonprofit organizations; indeed, more so than for-profit companies. As the firm Harbor Compliance points out, there’s a good reason for that—nonprofits are exempt from federal corporate taxes and can receive public funding. Both the IRS and states have requirements for nonprofits. The penalties for noncompliance can be severe. A…

Get a View into Your Nonprofit’s Outcomes with Dashboards
February 26, 2018
Get a View into Your Nonprofit’s Outcomes with Dashboards

Dashboards provide a window into your organization’s performance and financial health. With the increased emphasis on outcomes—defined as a change in skill, knowledge, attitude, behavior, condition, or status—nonprofits must demonstrate the progress of those outcomes in a visual, understandable way. An article in Nonprofit Quarterly notes that a dashboard must: Align definitions of success across…

Top 5 Myths about Fund Accounting in the Cloud
January 15, 2018
Top 5 Myths about Fund Accounting in the Cloud

In the mission-driven nonprofit world, fund accounting software can sometimes slip down the priority list. It’s not always easy to allocate budget dollars to back-office infrastructure that doesn’t directly support the nonprofit agenda and harder to find the time and expertise to make it all work. Some of the obstacles include: Capital investment for software…

Nonprofit IT: How to Get Your Finance Department to the Cloud
August 15, 2017
Nonprofit IT: How to Get Your Finance Department to the Cloud

If you’re an IT Director or CIO at a nonprofit organization, you may be experiencing something that sounds a little like this: In the last few years, you have moved a lot of systems from your internal network servers. Your Development department has migrated to a cloud-based donor management system like Salesforce. Your Program people…

 Back to Blog